Detissera v Ku-ring-gai Council [2016] NSWLEC 1116

Because the parties reached an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 and the Commissioner was satisfied that the agreed decision was one the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions, the proceedings had to be disposed of in accordance with that agreement.

Jurisdiction: Australia
Judgment Date: 05 April 2016
Procedural Posture: Class 1 Development Application Proceedings / Conciliation Conference; Agreement Under S 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979; Final Orders
Outcome: Proceedings disposed of in accordance with the parties' agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979.
Legal Topics: ['development Application' 'conciliation Conference' 'agreement Between the Parties' 'orders Under S 34(3)']

['planning and Environment' 'land and Environment Court Procedure'] ['development Application' 'conciliation Conference' 'agreement Between the Parties' 'orders Under S 34(3)']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 1 Amounts and remedies 1

Procedural Posture

Class 1 Development Application Proceedings / Conciliation Conference; Agreement Under S 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979; Final Orders

Legal Issues

1 ['Whether the agreement reached between the parties under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 was a decision that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions.' "Whether the proceedings should be disposed of in accordance with the parties' agreement."]

Ratio Decidendi

Court Disposition

Proceedings disposed of in accordance with the parties' agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979.

Orders

["The final orders to give effect to the parties' agreement were made on 5 April 2016."]