Jaymie Brian Ellis v Conaust Ltd [1995] IRCA 347
The hearing was adjourned on the basis that the Applicant was unable, despite attempts, to serve a material witness due to her unavailability, and that the need to obtain medical evidence was relevant to the Applicant's ability to present his case fairly.
- Parties
- Applicant: Jaymie Brian Ellis; Respondent: Conaust Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 24 July 1995
- Procedural Posture
- Industrial Law Termination of Employment / Interlocutory Application (hearing of Notice of Motion to Vacate Hearing Date, Adjourn Proceedings, and Related Procedural Orders)
- Outcome
- Notice of Motion granted; hearing vacated; case adjourned; procedural orders made; costs reserved.
- Legal Topics
- Termination of Employment, Adjournment of Proceedings, Procedural Orders, Service of Subpoenas, Medical Evidence in Employment Disputes
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Jaymie Brian Ellis
Applicant
Conaust Ltd
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Industrial Law Termination of Employment / Interlocutory Application (hearing of Notice of Motion to Vacate Hearing Date, Adjourn Proceedings, and Related Procedural Orders)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the hearing date should be vacated and the proceedings adjourned to allow service of subpoena on a witness and to obtain medical evidence
- 2 Whether the Applicant had sufficient reason for seeking adjournment of the hearing
Ratio Decidendi
The hearing was adjourned on the basis that the Applicant was unable, despite attempts, to serve a material witness due to her unavailability, and that the need to obtain medical evidence was relevant to the Applicant's ability to present his case fairly.
Court Disposition
Notice of Motion granted; hearing vacated; case adjourned; procedural orders made; costs reserved.
Orders
- Leave granted to Messrs Godfrey Stewart to file and serve notice of change pursuant to Sub-Rule 7 of Order 45 of the Industrial Relations Courts Rules
- Hearing date of 24 July 1995 vacated
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment