SafeWork NSW v JBS Australia Pty Limited [2020] NSWDC 678
JBS Australia Pty Limited failed in its non-delegable statutory duty under the Work Health and Safety Act 2011 (NSW) by not assessing and addressing foreseeable risks related to grass fires pursuant to s 19(1) and the associated Regulations, and despite previous similar incidents, did not provide adequate planning, training or equipment for dealing with such fires. This failure resulted in the death of a worker, and although post-incident remedial steps were taken, the offence fell within the mid-range of objective seriousness, warranting a substantial penalty reduced by the utilitarian value of an early guilty plea.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 06 November 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Sentence
- Outcome
- Conviction and fine imposed, with costs ordered.
- Legal Topics
- ['sentencing' "employer's Duties" 'workplace Death' 'risk Management' 'emergency Planning']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the defendant contravened its work health and safety duty by failing to manage risks and provide adequate procedures, instruction and training relating to grass fires, resulting in exposure of workers to risk of death or serious injury.']
Ratio Decidendi
JBS Australia Pty Limited failed in its non-delegable statutory duty under the Work Health and Safety Act 2011 (NSW) by not assessing and addressing foreseeable risks related to grass fires pursuant to s 19(1) and the associated Regulations, and despite previous similar incidents, did not provide adequate planning, training or equipment for dealing with such fires. This failure resulted in the death of a worker, and although post-incident remedial steps were taken, the offence fell within the mid-range of objective seriousness, warranting a substantial penalty reduced by the utilitarian value of an early guilty plea.
Court Disposition
Conviction and fine imposed, with costs ordered.
Orders
- ['The defendant is convicted.' 'The appropriate fine is $400,000.00 and that will be reduced by 25% to reflect a plea of guilty.' 'The defendant to pay a fine of $300,000.00.' 'Pursuant to s 122(2) of the Fines Act 1996, 50% of the fine imposed is to be paid to the prosecutor.' "The defendant is to pay the...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment