R.V. JCJ [2001] NSWCCA 477
No error by the sentencing judge was detected. The sentence imposed, including the fifty per cent discount for plea of guilty, contrition and assistance, was appropriate given the gravity of the offences and the applicant's circumstances. Leave to appeal is granted, but the appeal is dismissed.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 23 November 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Leave to Appeal Against Sentence, Judgment
- Outcome
- leave to appeal granted; appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- ['sentencing' 'detention for Advantage' 'sexual Intercourse Without Consent in Circumstances of Aggravation']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Leave to Appeal Against Sentence, Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether sentence imposed was manifestly excessive given applicant’s circumstances' "Whether sentencing judge erred in assessing applicant's contrition and psychological vulnerability" 'Whether fifty percent discount for plea, contrition, and assistance was appropriate']
Ratio Decidendi
No error by the sentencing judge was detected. The sentence imposed, including the fifty per cent discount for plea of guilty, contrition and assistance, was appropriate given the gravity of the offences and the applicant's circumstances. Leave to appeal is granted, but the appeal is dismissed.
Court Disposition
leave to appeal granted; appeal dismissed
Orders
- ['Leave to appeal against sentence is granted.' 'Appeal against sentence is dismissed.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment