JD v R [2013] NSWCCA 198
There was no error in the trial judge's refusal of a temporary stay. Any potential prejudice from the complainant's pregnancy or her giving evidence remotely could be addressed by jury directions and logistical arrangements for document delivery. The judge's discretion was properly exercised, and the statutory test under s 7(2)(c) was correctly applied.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 09 August 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Leave to Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Interlocutory Ruling (temporary Stay of Trial Refusal)
- Outcome
- Leave refused
- Legal Topics
- ['application for Leave to Appeal' 'interlocutory Ruling' 'temporary Stay' 'sexual Assault' 'audio Visual Evidence' 'judicial Discretion' 'prejudice' 'jury Directions']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Leave to Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Interlocutory Ruling (temporary Stay of Trial Refusal)
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the trial judge erred in refusing a temporary stay of trial where complainant would give evidence via audio-visual link due to pregnancy' 'Whether the trial judge misapplied the test for unfairness under s 7(2)(c) Evidence (Audio and Audio Visual Links) Act 1998' "Whether the advanced stage of complainant's pregnancy would unfairly prejudice the applicant's right to a fair trial"]
Ratio Decidendi
There was no error in the trial judge's refusal of a temporary stay. Any potential prejudice from the complainant's pregnancy or her giving evidence remotely could be addressed by jury directions and logistical arrangements for document delivery. The judge's discretion was properly exercised, and the statutory test under s 7(2)(c) was correctly applied.
Court Disposition
Leave refused
Orders
- ['Leave to appeal refused']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment