Karl J v Parramatta City Council [2005] NSWLEC 84
The appeal is upheld, the amended development application is approved, and 50% of the applicant's costs incurred from 1 December 2004 including today's proceedings are to be paid by the council due to unnecessary delay caused by awaiting amendment to the Development Control Plan.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 27 January 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld; application approved subject to conditions; partial costs awarded
- Legal Topics
- ['development Application' 'heritage Conservation Area' 'development Control Plan' 'setback' 'height' 'costs']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether to approve the amended development application for a carport with setback and reduced height' 'Whether the applicant should be awarded costs due to unnecessary delay']
Ratio Decidendi
The appeal is upheld, the amended development application is approved, and 50% of the applicant's costs incurred from 1 December 2004 including today's proceedings are to be paid by the council due to unnecessary delay caused by awaiting amendment to the Development Control Plan.
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld; application approved subject to conditions; partial costs awarded
Orders
- ['The appeal in respect of 12 Wyralla Avenue, Epping is upheld.' "The development application is approved subject to amendments as per Annexure 'A'." 'Exhibits are returned.' 'The issue of costs is referred to the Chief Judge for concurrence; parties have 14 days to make submissions.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment