Kelly, Jean v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [1998] FCA 1623
The application was dismissed because the Refugee Review Tribunal's finding—that the applicant's fear of persecution was not objectively well-founded in light of changed circumstances and the availability of relocation options—was supported by law and evidence. The legal tests for a protection visa were correctly...
Source-derived case information.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 09 December 1998
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review of Migration Decision / Judgment at First Instance
- Outcome
- Application dismissed with costs
- Legal Topics
- ['protection Visas' 'refugees Convention' 'well Founded Fear of Persecution' 'internal Relocation' 'judicial Review' 'refugee Status Determination']
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review of Migration Decision / Judgment at First Instance
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the applicant's fear of persecution is well-founded under the Refugees Convention" 'Whether it was reasonable for the applicant to be required to relocate within the European Union' 'Whether the Refugee Review Tribunal erred in law in its application of the relevant legal tests']
Ratio Decidendi
The application was dismissed because the Refugee Review Tribunal's finding—that the applicant's fear of persecution was not objectively well-founded in light of changed circumstances and the availability of relocation options—was supported by law and evidence. The legal tests for a protection visa were correctly applied.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed with costs
Orders
- ['The application be dismissed with costs.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment