Tomlinson v Hoefler [1999] FCA 1700
The judgment debtor was aware, during the trial, that he was a party and was being represented; there is no proper basis for attacking the judgment debt; a sequestration order should be made against the estate of the judgment debtor.
- Parties
- Applicant: Jean Tomlinson; Respondent: Peter Hoefler
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 01 December 1999
- Procedural Posture
- Bankruptcy Petition / Final Judgment and Orders
- Outcome
- Sequestration order made against the estate of the judgment debtor; applicant entitled to costs out of the estate with priority.
- Legal Topics
- Sequestration Order, Natural Justice, Issue Estoppel, Representation in Proceedings
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Jean Tomlinson
Applicant
Peter Hoefler
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Bankruptcy Petition / Final Judgment and Orders
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the judgment debtor was denied natural justice by not being given an opportunity to be heard
- 2 Whether the judgment debtor was represented in the original proceedings
- 3 Whether to go behind the judgment debt for bankruptcy purposes
Ratio Decidendi
The judgment debtor was aware, during the trial, that he was a party and was being represented; there is no proper basis for attacking the judgment debt; a sequestration order should be made against the estate of the judgment debtor.
Court Disposition
Sequestration order made against the estate of the judgment debtor; applicant entitled to costs out of the estate with priority.
Orders
- A sequestration order be made against the estate of the judgment debtor pursuant to section 43 of the Bankruptcy Act.
- The petitioning creditor have her costs of the petition, including reserved costs, paid out of the estate with priority in accordance with section 109 of the Bankruptcy Act.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment