Jeanelle Calandra v Hunters Hill Council [2015] NSWLEC 1406
The Court disposed of the proceedings in accordance with the agreement reached by the parties under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979, being satisfied that the decision was one it could have made in the proper exercise of its functions.
- Parties
- Applicant: Jeanelle Calandra; Respondent: Hunters Hill Council
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 08 October 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Class 1 Development Application (land and Environment Court) / Post Conciliation Conference; Final Orders on Agreement
- Outcome
- Orders made in accordance with agreement between parties under s 34(3) Land and Environment Court Act 1979
- Legal Topics
- Development Application, Conciliation Conference, Orders by Consent
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Jeanelle Calandra
Applicant
Hunters Hill Council
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Class 1 Development Application (land and Environment Court) / Post Conciliation Conference; Final Orders on Agreement
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether an agreement was reached between the parties at or after conciliation conference
- 2 Whether the Court was satisfied that the decision was one it could have made in the proper exercise of its functions under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979
Ratio Decidendi
The Court disposed of the proceedings in accordance with the agreement reached by the parties under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979, being satisfied that the decision was one it could have made in the proper exercise of its functions.
Court Disposition
Orders made in accordance with agreement between parties under s 34(3) Land and Environment Court Act 1979
Orders
- Final orders made to give effect to the agreement between the parties as recorded in the orders dated 08 October 2015
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment