Kevern v Marshall [2004] NSWSC 300

Kevern v Marshall [2004] NSWSC 300

The settlement terms were not fully complied with by the plaintiff, and the relief sought raises substantial matters of controversy. As no undertaking to pay was embodied in a court order and summary disposition is inappropriate, enforcement by notice of motion is not permitted; the motion was dismissed with costs.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
15 April 2004
Procedural Posture
Motion / Enforcement of Previous Court Orders
Outcome
Motion dismissed with costs.
Legal Topics
['enforcement of Court Orders' 'settlement Agreements' 'rectification' 'unjust Enrichment']
['procedure' 'equity'] ['enforcement of Court Orders' 'settlement Agreements' 'rectification' 'unjust Enrichment']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Motion / Enforcement of Previous Court Orders

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the plaintiff can enforce settlement terms by notice of motion under Supreme Court Act 1970, s 63.' 'Whether there was complete compliance with the settlement terms.' 'Whether relief sought (rectification or unjust enrichment) can be determined summarily.']

Ratio Decidendi

The settlement terms were not fully complied with by the plaintiff, and the relief sought raises substantial matters of controversy. As no undertaking to pay was embodied in a court order and summary disposition is inappropriate, enforcement by notice of motion is not permitted; the motion was dismissed with costs.

Court Disposition

Motion dismissed with costs.

Orders

  • ["Plaintiff's motion dismissed." "Plaintiff to pay defendant's costs."]