Pickering, in the matter of Pickering [2009] FCA 809
The Court held that the proposed applications were frivolous, vexatious, and an abuse of process; the release executed with Centrelink was enforceable and precluded further claims; and judges cannot be sued for actions undertaken in their judicial capacity. No direction was made to the Registrar to accept or issue the proposed applications.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 03 August 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Ex Parte Application for Directions / Application for Direction to Registrar Under Federal Court Rules O 46, R 7(2)
- Outcome
- Application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- ['abuse of Process' 'frivolous and Vexatious Proceedings' 'registrar’s Powers' 'judicial Immunity']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Ex Parte Application for Directions / Application for Direction to Registrar Under Federal Court Rules O 46, R 7(2)
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the Court should direct the Registrar to issue two proposed originating applications refused by the Registrar as frivolous, vexatious or abusive of process.' 'Whether the proposed proceedings against Centrelink and a Federal Court judge are an abuse of process.']
Ratio Decidendi
The Court held that the proposed applications were frivolous, vexatious, and an abuse of process; the release executed with Centrelink was enforceable and precluded further claims; and judges cannot be sued for actions undertaken in their judicial capacity. No direction was made to the Registrar to accept or issue the proposed applications.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed
Orders
- ['The application made by Mr Pickering pursuant to O 46, r 7(2), that directions be given to the Registrar to issue two originating applications lodged with the Western Australia District Registry of the Court on 19 May 2009, is dismissed.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment