Helfenbaum v St George Bank Ltd [2001] FCA 1736

Helfenbaum v St George Bank Ltd [2001] FCA 1736

Because the applicant's trustee in bankruptcy did not elect within the extended time after notice under s 60(3) of the Bankruptcy Act 1966 to prosecute or discontinue the action, the trustee was deemed to have abandoned the action, making it appropriate to grant the respondent's motion and strike out the application.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
07 December 2001
Procedural Posture
Application Affected by Bankruptcy of the Applicant / Respondent's Motion to Strike Out the Application; Ex Tempore Reasons for Judgment
Outcome
Application struck out; applicant ordered to pay the costs of the motion.
Legal Topics
['sequestration Order' 'trustee Election to Prosecute or Discontinue Action' 'deemed Abandonment of Action' 'strike Out']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 1 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Application Affected by Bankruptcy of the Applicant / Respondent's Motion to Strike Out the Application; Ex Tempore Reasons for Judgment

  1. 1 ["Whether the application should be struck out because the applicant's trustee in bankruptcy did not elect within the time allowed to prosecute or discontinue the action after notice under s 60(3) of the Bankruptcy Act 1966."]

Ratio Decidendi

Because the applicant's trustee in bankruptcy did not elect within the extended time after notice under s 60(3) of the Bankruptcy Act 1966 to prosecute or discontinue the action, the trustee was deemed to have abandoned the action, making it appropriate to grant the respondent's motion and strike out the application.

Court Disposition

Application struck out; applicant ordered to pay the costs of the motion.

Orders

  • ['The application be struck out.' 'The costs of the motion be paid by the applicant.']