Gilmour v R [2018] NSWCCA 295
The sentencing Judge erred by applying the exceptional circumstances threshold, but upon re-exercise of the sentencing discretion under s.6(3) Criminal Appeal Act 1912 and consideration of all objective and subjective circumstances including the applicant's mental health, seriousness of offending, and parity with co-offenders, no lesser sentence is warranted. The original sentence stands.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 12 December 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal Against Sentence / Court of Criminal Appeal Leave to Appeal and Determination
- Outcome
- Leave to appeal against sentence granted; appeal dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- ['appeal Against Sentence' 'drug Supply Offences' 'sentencing Discretion' 'exceptional Circumstances in Sentencing' 'parity Principle' 'mental Illness and Sentencing']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal Against Sentence / Court of Criminal Appeal Leave to Appeal and Determination
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the sentencing Judge erred by requiring 'exceptional circumstances' for non-custodial sentence in drug supply offences" "Whether the Judge failed to adequately consider the applicant's mental illness in sentencing" 'Whether the sentence was manifestly excessive']
Ratio Decidendi
The sentencing Judge erred by applying the exceptional circumstances threshold, but upon re-exercise of the sentencing discretion under s.6(3) Criminal Appeal Act 1912 and consideration of all objective and subjective circumstances including the applicant's mental health, seriousness of offending, and parity with co-offenders, no lesser sentence is warranted. The original sentence stands.
Court Disposition
Leave to appeal against sentence granted; appeal dismissed.
Orders
- ['Leave to appeal against sentence granted.' 'Appeal dismissed.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment