JEG Constructions No.2 Pty Ltd v Workers Compensation Nominal Insurer [2007] NSWSC 1017
The obligation to pay the premiums arose, at least in part, from circumstances which existed before the fixed date under the deed of company arrangement, making the claims subject to the deed and barring them from further pursuit, and thus creating a genuine dispute regarding the debt sufficient to set aside the statutory demand.
- Parties
- Plaintiff: JEG Constructions No. 2 Pty Ltd T/A Tailored Property Constructions; Defendant: Workers Compensation Nominal Insurer by its Scheme Agent Allianz Australia Workers' Compensation (NSW) Limited ABN 17 003 087 545
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 03 September 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Application / Application to Set Aside Statutory Demand
- Outcome
- Statutory demand set aside.
- Legal Topics
- Statutory Demand, Deed of Company Arrangement, Contingent Liabilities
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
JEG Constructions No. 2 Pty Ltd T/A Tailored Property Constructions
Plaintiff
Workers Compensation Nominal Insurer by its Scheme Agent Allianz Australia Workers' Compensation (NSW) Limited ABN 17 003 087 545
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Application / Application to Set Aside Statutory Demand
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the claims made in the statutory demand are barred by the definition of 'claim' and 'fixed date' in the deed of company arrangement
- 2 Whether the circumstances giving rise to the claims occurred on or before the fixed date
Ratio Decidendi
The obligation to pay the premiums arose, at least in part, from circumstances which existed before the fixed date under the deed of company arrangement, making the claims subject to the deed and barring them from further pursuit, and thus creating a genuine dispute regarding the debt sufficient to set aside the statutory demand.
Court Disposition
Statutory demand set aside.
Orders
- Statutory demand is set aside.
- The defendant is to pay the plaintiff's costs of the application.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment