Application by Jemena Gas Networks (NSW) Ltd [2016] ACompT 5
The Tribunal held that the AER made material errors in the exercise of its discretion regarding the debt transition methodology (by not permitting JGN to advance Option 3 in its revised proposal), and in its approach to ME capex by relying on a five-year historical average of contract rates while disregarding known and efficient current contractual rates. These errors, as established, carried a real risk of adversely affecting the long term interests of consumers and thus correcting them would likely result in a materially preferable designated NGO decision. The AER’s Final Decision was set aside and remitted for reconsideration in accordance with the Tribunal’s directions.
- Parties
- Applicant: Jemena Gas Networks (NSW) Ltd; Original Decision Maker: Australian Energy Regulator; Intervener: AusNet Services (Distribution) Pty Ltd; Intervener: AusNet Services (Transmission) Ltd; Intervener: Australian Gas Networks Ltd; Intervener: Citipower Pty Ltd; Intervener: Powercor Australia Ltd; Intervener: SA Power Networks; Intervener: United Energy Distribution Pty Ltd; Intervener: Ergon Energy Corporation Ltd; Intervener: Minister for Resources, Energy and Northern Australia
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 26 February 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Review Under the National Gas Law / Determination of Tribunal on Review of Aer's Final Decision Set Aside and Remitted
- Outcome
- AER's Final Decision set aside and remitted for reconsideration in accordance with directions.
- Legal Topics
- Review of Access Arrangement Decision, Return on Debt Methodology, Return on Equity, Value of Imputation Credits (gamma), Forecast Capital Expenditure (me Capex), Procedural Fairness and Consultation, National Gas Law and National Gas Rules Interpretation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Jemena Gas Networks (NSW) Ltd
Applicant
Australian Energy Regulator
Original Decision Maker
AusNet Services (Distribution) Pty Ltd
Intervener
AusNet Services (Transmission) Ltd
Intervener
Australian Gas Networks Ltd
Intervener
Citipower Pty Ltd
Intervener
Powercor Australia Ltd
Intervener
SA Power Networks
Intervener
United Energy Distribution Pty Ltd
Intervener
Ergon Energy Corporation Ltd
Intervener
Minister for Resources, Energy and Northern Australia
Intervener
Procedural Posture
Application for Review Under the National Gas Law / Determination of Tribunal on Review of Aer's Final Decision Set Aside and Remitted
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether AER erred in refusing JGN's revised proposal on return on debt methodology (debt transition options)
- 2 Whether AER erred in approach to rate of return on equity and gamma
- 3 Whether AER erred in its market expansion capital expenditure decision (ME capex)
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal held that the AER made material errors in the exercise of its discretion regarding the debt transition methodology (by not permitting JGN to advance Option 3 in its revised proposal), and in its approach to ME capex by relying on a five-year historical average of contract rates while disregarding known and efficient current contractual rates. These errors, as established, carried a real risk of adversely affecting the long term interests of consumers and thus correcting them would likely result in a materially preferable designated NGO decision. The AER’s Final Decision was set aside and remitted for reconsideration in accordance with the Tribunal’s directions.
Court Disposition
AER's Final Decision set aside and remitted for reconsideration in accordance with directions.
Orders
- Pursuant to s 259(2) of the National Gas Law, the Final Decision – Jemena Gas Networks (NSW) Ltd Access Arrangement 2015-20 Overview, June 2015, including attachments is set aside and remitted to the Australian Energy Regulator (AER) to make the decision again as follows: (a) AER to make decision on debt consistent...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment