Wood v Shee [2007] NSWSC 227

Wood v Shee [2007] NSWSC 227

Because the sole deposit into the joint account was $20,000 from a cheque in favour of the plaintiff from the Public Trustee in respect of her mother's estate, and the evidence showed the money was put into the joint account only to protect it from access by the plaintiff's then partner and that the first defendant had no beneficial interest, the plaintiff was the sole beneficial owner of the funds and the Credit Union should pay the proceeds to her.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
14 March 2007
Procedural Posture
Equity Proceedings Concerning Beneficial Ownership of Funds in a Joint Bank Account / Judgment on Summons; First Defendant Did Not Appear After Substituted Service Was Proved
Outcome
Trust interest in the whole fund declared in favour of the plaintiff; Credit Union joined and ordered to pay the proceeds to the plaintiff; first defendant ordered to pay the plaintiff's costs.
Legal Topics
['implied Trusts' 'resulting Trusts' 'presumed Intention' 'rebuttal of Implication' 'intention to Benefit' 'evidence of Common Intention' 'beneficial Ownership of Joint Bank Account']
['equity' 'trusts and Trustees'] ['implied Trusts' 'resulting Trusts' 'presumed Intention' 'rebuttal of Implication' 'intention to Benefit' 'evidence of Common Intention' 'beneficial Ownership of Joint Bank Account']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Equity Proceedings Concerning Beneficial Ownership of Funds in a Joint Bank Account / Judgment on Summons; First Defendant Did Not Appear After Substituted Service Was Proved

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the plaintiff was the sole beneficial owner of funds held in a joint account with the first defendant.' 'Whether the Community Alliance Credit Union Limited should be joined and ordered to pay the account proceeds to the plaintiff.']

Ratio Decidendi

Because the sole deposit into the joint account was $20,000 from a cheque in favour of the plaintiff from the Public Trustee in respect of her mother's estate, and the evidence showed the money was put into the joint account only to protect it from access by the plaintiff's then partner and that the first defendant had no beneficial interest, the plaintiff was the sole beneficial owner of the funds and the Credit Union should pay the proceeds to her.

Court Disposition

Trust interest in the whole fund declared in favour of the plaintiff; Credit Union joined and ordered to pay the proceeds to the plaintiff; first defendant ordered to pay the plaintiff's costs.

Orders

  • ['The summons was amended to join Community Alliance Credit Union Limited as second defendant.' 'The plaintiff was declared the sole beneficial owner of the funds in the account.' 'Community Alliance Credit Union Limited was ordered to pay the proceeds of the account to the plaintiff.' "The first defendant was...