Peterson v Fashkeev [2007] FCA 562

Peterson v Fashkeev [2007] FCA 562

The balance of convenience is not in favour of granting a stay of the sequestration order as the appellant has not demonstrated an arguable case for solvency on the material before the Court and has alternative remedies regarding the trustee's decision to abandon participation in separate proceedings. The detriments to the estate and creditors outweigh any prejudice to the appellant.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
13 April 2007
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Interlocutory Application for Stay Pending Appeal
Outcome
Application for stay of sequestration order refused.
Legal Topics
['stay of Sequestration Order' 'appeal Procedure' 'costs Order']
['bankruptcy'] ['stay of Sequestration Order' 'appeal Procedure' 'costs Order']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Interlocutory Application for Stay Pending Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether a stay of the sequestration order should be granted pending appeal' 'Whether there is an arguable case for appeal regarding refusal of adjournment' 'Whether there is an arguable case for appeal regarding solvency of appellant']

Ratio Decidendi

The balance of convenience is not in favour of granting a stay of the sequestration order as the appellant has not demonstrated an arguable case for solvency on the material before the Court and has alternative remedies regarding the trustee's decision to abandon participation in separate proceedings. The detriments to the estate and creditors outweigh any prejudice to the appellant.

Court Disposition

Application for stay of sequestration order refused.

Orders

  • ['Application for stay of sequestration order refused.' 'Appellant to pay respondents and trustees costs of the notice of motion of 13 April 2007. Trustees costs are to be costs in the administration, unless the sequestration order is set aside, in which case the costs are trustees costs against the appellant...