Jenkins v Leichhardt Council [2000] NSWLEC 150
Limited participation by resident objectors is justified where the Council has changed its position on development consent, and allowing participation will not cause unfairness to the applicant. Such participation promotes the interests of justice and falls within the Court's discretion under s 38(2) of the Act.
- Parties
- Applicant: Jenkins; Respondent: Leichhardt Council
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 11 July 2000
- Procedural Posture
- Development Appeal / Interlocutory Motion for Participation by Objectors
- Outcome
- Notice of Motion granted
- Legal Topics
- Resident Objector Participation, Development Appeals, Practice and Procedure
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Jenkins
Applicant
Leichhardt Council
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Development Appeal / Interlocutory Motion for Participation by Objectors
Legal Issues
- 1 Should resident objectors be granted leave for limited participation in a hearing of a development appeal?
Ratio Decidendi
Limited participation by resident objectors is justified where the Council has changed its position on development consent, and allowing participation will not cause unfairness to the applicant. Such participation promotes the interests of justice and falls within the Court's discretion under s 38(2) of the Act.
Court Disposition
Notice of Motion granted
Orders
- Pursuant to s 38(2) of the Court Act, resident objectors named in the Notice of Motion filed 4 July 2000 are granted leave to participate at the hearing by legal representation, adducing expert evidence (Kim Burrell's report), adducing lay evidence (limited to two residents whose statements are to be filed and...
- Participation is subject to any procedural directions given by the Presiding Commissioner in the interest of fairness and efficiency.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment