In the matter of Hardy Bros Equipment Pty Ltd [2021] NSWSC 372

In the matter of Hardy Bros Equipment Pty Ltd [2021] NSWSC 372

Disclosure is not necessary nor are exceptional circumstances established, as the plaintiff's statutory inspection rights have not yet been exercised and access is unconditionally offered. The circumstances alleged do not justify pre-evidence disclosure under the Practice Note SC Eq 11, and broadly drafted categories fail to demonstrate necessity or relevance.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
14 April 2021
Procedural Posture
Interlocutory Application / Application for Disclosure Before Service of Evidence
Outcome
Plaintiff's interlocutory process dismissed
Legal Topics
['interlocutory Disclosure' "directors' Duties" 'statutory Right of Inspection' 'practice Note SC Eq 11']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Interlocutory Application / Application for Disclosure Before Service of Evidence

  1. 1 ['Whether disclosure of categories of documents should be ordered prior to service of evidence' 'Necessity for disclosure and exceptional circumstances under Practice Note SC Eq 11' 'Relevance of bank statements and financial records to pleaded allegations' 'Statutory right to inspect books and records of the company']

Ratio Decidendi

Disclosure is not necessary nor are exceptional circumstances established, as the plaintiff's statutory inspection rights have not yet been exercised and access is unconditionally offered. The circumstances alleged do not justify pre-evidence disclosure under the Practice Note SC Eq 11, and broadly drafted categories fail to demonstrate necessity or relevance.

Court Disposition

Plaintiff's interlocutory process dismissed

Orders

  • ["Order that the plaintiff's interlocutory process filed on 17 March 2021 is dismissed." 'The matter is listed for directions before the Corporations List Judge at 9.30am on 3 May 2021.']