Williams v NSW Land and Housing [2012] NSWSC 1022
Ms Williams was denied procedural fairness by the Tribunal's failure to adequately explain her right to cross-examine witnesses and to provide a fair opportunity to present her case, including the refusal to grant an adjournment despite her inability to prepare due to participation in a rehabilitation program, and by treating her evidence and that of the first defendant's witnesses unequally; therefore, the Tribunal's decision must be set aside.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 31 August 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- Tribunal's decision set aside; expenses awarded to Ms Williams.
- Legal Topics
- ['appeal From Consumer Trader and Tenancy Tribunal' 'procedural Fairness' 'adjournment' 'self Represented Litigants']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the Tribunal denied procedural fairness to Ms Williams in the conduct of her tenancy hearing' 'Whether failure to allow adjournment and lack of explanation of cross-examination rights amounted to denial of natural justice']
Ratio Decidendi
Ms Williams was denied procedural fairness by the Tribunal's failure to adequately explain her right to cross-examine witnesses and to provide a fair opportunity to present her case, including the refusal to grant an adjournment despite her inability to prepare due to participation in a rehabilitation program, and by treating her evidence and that of the first defendant's witnesses unequally; therefore, the Tribunal's decision must be set aside.
Court Disposition
Tribunal's decision set aside; expenses awarded to Ms Williams.
Orders
- ["The Tribunal's decision of 23 May 2012 be set aside." "The first defendant bear Ms Williams' expenses of the proceedings, as agreed or assessed."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment