Ibarcena v Cole [2003] FCA 417

Ibarcena v Cole [2003] FCA 417

The Federal Court lacks jurisdiction to hear an appeal under s 44 of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 where the Tribunal has reserved its decision and not yet made a final determination; thus, the application is premature and must be dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

Source-derived case information.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
14 April 2003
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Application for Appeal and Stay; Judgment on Jurisdictional Objection
Outcome
Application dismissed as premature; no jurisdiction to appeal prior to Tribunal’s final decision.
Legal Topics
['appeals From Administrative Appeals Tribunal' 'jurisdiction' 'finality of Decisions']
['administrative Law' 'social Security Law'] ['appeals From Administrative Appeals Tribunal' 'jurisdiction' 'finality of Decisions']

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Application for Appeal and Stay; Judgment on Jurisdictional Objection

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ["Whether the Federal Court's jurisdiction is enlivened under s 44 of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth) when the Tribunal has not yet rendered a final decision."]

Ratio Decidendi

The Federal Court lacks jurisdiction to hear an appeal under s 44 of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 where the Tribunal has reserved its decision and not yet made a final determination; thus, the application is premature and must be dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed as premature; no jurisdiction to appeal prior to Tribunal’s final decision.

Orders

  • ['The application be dismissed.']