Chester v Prestige Promotions Pty Limited (No.2) [2014] NSWSC 1103
The court found that although the plaintiffs had initially failed to pay rent as required by the order, they rectified the arrears before the motion was heard. In these circumstances, the interests of justice required dismissal of the motion, but the plaintiffs were ordered to pay the defendant’s costs as the lapse originated from an erroneous assurance regarding the rent.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 31 July 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Interlocutory Motion
- Outcome
- Motion dismissed; plaintiffs to pay defendant's costs of the Motion.
- Legal Topics
- ['stays of Execution' 'judgments and Orders' 'possession Orders' 'payment of Rent' 'cost Orders']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Civil / Interlocutory Motion
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether conditions for a stay of execution of a writ of possession—namely payment of rent—were satisfied' "Whether the plaintiffs should pay the defendant's costs of the motion"]
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that although the plaintiffs had initially failed to pay rent as required by the order, they rectified the arrears before the motion was heard. In these circumstances, the interests of justice required dismissal of the motion, but the plaintiffs were ordered to pay the defendant’s costs as the lapse originated from an erroneous assurance regarding the rent.
Court Disposition
Motion dismissed; plaintiffs to pay defendant's costs of the Motion.
Orders
- ['Motion filed 29 July 2014 is dismissed.' "The plaintiffs are to pay the defendant's costs of the Motion."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment