Gordon v Glowberth Pty Ltd (No 2) [2024] NSWSC 263
New freezing orders should be made in substantially the form proposed by the plaintiff and agreed by Glowberth, incorporating the amendment to allow payment of reasonable legal costs rather than a capped amount. Costs for both the discharge and new freezing orders applications will be costs in the cause, reflecting the mixed outcome and overall practical result favouring the plaintiff; no order as to costs will be made against the Official Trustee.
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Jerry Gordon; First Defendant: Glowberth Pty Ltd; Second Defendant: Official Trustee in Bankruptcy
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 15 March 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Interlocutory Application / Post Principal Judgment, Orders Following Submissions
- Outcome
- existing freezing orders discharged, new freezing orders made, costs in the cause
- Legal Topics
- Freezing Orders, Costs, Interim Preservation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Jerry Gordon
Plaintiff
Glowberth Pty Ltd
First Defendant
Official Trustee in Bankruptcy
Second Defendant
Procedural Posture
Interlocutory Application / Post Principal Judgment, Orders Following Submissions
Legal Issues
- 1 Should new freezing orders be made against Glowberth Pty Ltd to give effect to the Principal Judgment?
- 2 How should the costs of the applications to discharge the original freezing orders and for new freezing orders be determined?
Ratio Decidendi
New freezing orders should be made in substantially the form proposed by the plaintiff and agreed by Glowberth, incorporating the amendment to allow payment of reasonable legal costs rather than a capped amount. Costs for both the discharge and new freezing orders applications will be costs in the cause, reflecting the mixed outcome and overall practical result favouring the plaintiff; no order as to costs will be made against the Official Trustee.
Court Disposition
existing freezing orders discharged, new freezing orders made, costs in the cause
Orders
- Order discharging order 5 against the first defendant made on 20 September 2023, as extended and varied by order 1 made on 22 September 2023 (Freezing Orders)
- Orders until further order against the first defendant in the form annexed as 'Annexure A' (freezing orders)
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment