Bennette v Byron Shire Council [2001] NSWLEC 157
The appeal is upheld and development consent granted as the amended plans and conditions address all significant environmental, flooding, traffic, and amenity concerns raised, comply with relevant planning controls and zoning, and the Court is satisfied impacts are managed appropriately.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 26 April 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Development Application Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal upheld, development consent granted
- Legal Topics
- ['development Consent' 'subdivision' 'environmental Impact' 'flooding' 'traffic Management' 'stormwater Management']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Development Application Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the proposed subdivision and development should be granted consent' 'Whether environmental, traffic, flooding and stormwater concerns have been sufficiently addressed' 'Compliance with Development Control Plan criteria' 'Provision for public reserve and community amenity']
Ratio Decidendi
The appeal is upheld and development consent granted as the amended plans and conditions address all significant environmental, flooding, traffic, and amenity concerns raised, comply with relevant planning controls and zoning, and the Court is satisfied impacts are managed appropriately.
Court Disposition
appeal upheld, development consent granted
Orders
- ['Appeal upheld.' 'Development application number 99/0943 for the proposed subdivision of part Lot 65, DP 1001135 Precinct 1 and 2 Suffolk Park for residential purposes is determined by granting of consent subject to the conditions attached hereto in the form of Exhibit S.' 'The exhibits apart from Exhibits S and G...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment