City of Sydney Council v Schwartz [2003] NSWLEC 261

City of Sydney Council v Schwartz [2003] NSWLEC 261

In assessing penalty for unauthorised development on a heritage item, relevant factors include scale of works, absence of direct environmental harm, defendant's character, plea of guilty, previous related offences, and agreement to pay prosecutor's costs. Mitigating circumstances warrant reduction of penalty.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
11 September 2003
Procedural Posture
Prosecution / Assessment of Penalty After Plea of Guilty
Outcome
conviction and imposition of penalty
Legal Topics
['unauthorised Development' 'heritage Protection' 'assessment of Penalty' 'previous Offences']
['environmental Law' 'planning Law'] ['unauthorised Development' 'heritage Protection' 'assessment of Penalty' 'previous Offences']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Prosecution / Assessment of Penalty After Plea of Guilty

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the defendant carried out development without consent contrary to s 76A(1) and s 125(1) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979' 'Assessment of penalty for unauthorised works' 'Relevance of previous offences and mitigating factors']

Ratio Decidendi

In assessing penalty for unauthorised development on a heritage item, relevant factors include scale of works, absence of direct environmental harm, defendant's character, plea of guilty, previous related offences, and agreement to pay prosecutor's costs. Mitigating circumstances warrant reduction of penalty.

Court Disposition

conviction and imposition of penalty

Orders

  • ['The defendant is guilty of the offence charged' 'The defendant is ordered to pay a penalty in the sum of $50,000' 'By consent, the defendant is ordered to pay the costs of the prosecutor in the sum of $20,500' 'The exhibits may be returned']