Baker v Patrick Projects Pty Ltd (No 2) [2014] FCAFC 166
The Court held that Mr Baker's application for judicial review was instituted without reasonable cause because the grounds pressed had no reasonable prospects of success and were manifestly untenable; thus, s 570(2)(a) of the Fair Work Act was satisfied, allowing an order for costs against Mr Baker.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 05 December 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Costs (appeal/judicial Review) / Post Judgment (after Dismissal of Judicial Review Application)
- Outcome
- Costs application granted; order for costs against applicant.
- Legal Topics
- ['costs' 'judicial Review' 'fair Work Act 2009' 'vexatious Proceedings']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application for Costs (appeal/judicial Review) / Post Judgment (after Dismissal of Judicial Review Application)
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the proceedings were instituted without reasonable cause under s 570 of the Fair Work Act 2009' 'Whether the application for judicial review had reasonable prospects of success' "Interpretation of 'without reasonable cause' in the context of the Fair Work Act"]
Ratio Decidendi
The Court held that Mr Baker's application for judicial review was instituted without reasonable cause because the grounds pressed had no reasonable prospects of success and were manifestly untenable; thus, s 570(2)(a) of the Fair Work Act was satisfied, allowing an order for costs against Mr Baker.
Court Disposition
Costs application granted; order for costs against applicant.
Orders
- ["The applicant (Jesse Baker) pay the first respondent's (Patrick Projects Pty Ltd) costs of the application."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment