Clarke & anor v Jessica McFarlane bht Ernest Frederick McFarlane [2008] NSWSC 432
Neither party acted so unreasonably as to warrant a special costs order; defendant's costs on party/party basis and plaintiffs' costs on indemnity basis are to be paid out of the estate.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 10 April 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Next of Kin Inquiry (equity Division, Supreme Court of Nsw) / Post Determination of Entitlement, Determination of Costs
- Outcome
- Plaintiffs and defendant agreed on entitlement; orders made for costs to be paid out of the estate.
- Legal Topics
- ['intestacy' 'next of Kin Inquiry' 'party/party Costs' 'indemnity Costs']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Next of Kin Inquiry (equity Division, Supreme Court of Nsw) / Post Determination of Entitlement, Determination of Costs
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether Jessica McFarlane was the daughter of Maurice Clarke and thus entitled to a share of Maureen Clarke's estate on intestacy" 'Appropriate costs order between parties in next of kin inquiry']
Ratio Decidendi
Neither party acted so unreasonably as to warrant a special costs order; defendant's costs on party/party basis and plaintiffs' costs on indemnity basis are to be paid out of the estate.
Court Disposition
Plaintiffs and defendant agreed on entitlement; orders made for costs to be paid out of the estate.
Orders
- ['Declaration in terms of paragraph 1 of the Short Minutes of Order (as amended) made and placed with the papers.' 'Orders 2 and 3 in the Short Minutes made.' "Defendant's costs on party/party basis and plaintiffs' costs on indemnity basis to be paid out of the estate." 'Exhibits may be returned.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment