Robinson-Murray v Consumer, Trader & Tenancy Tribunal [2013] NSWSC 1914
The plaintiff was denied procedural fairness when the Tribunal Member refused to adjourn the hearing and continued in her absence, preventing her from presenting evidence on a central factual issue regarding the amount received for the trade-in vehicle. This denial constituted grounds for setting aside the Tribunal's orders.
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Jessica Robinson-Murray; First Defendant: Consumer, Trader & Tenancy Tribunal; Second Defendant: SSS Best Cars Pty Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 20 December 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld; Tribunal orders set aside; matter remitted; costs ordered against second defendant.
- Legal Topics
- Judicial Review, Procedural Fairness, Appeal From Tribunal
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Jessica Robinson-Murray
Plaintiff
Consumer, Trader & Tenancy Tribunal
First Defendant
SSS Best Cars Pty Ltd
Second Defendant
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the plaintiff was denied procedural fairness in the Tribunal hearing
Ratio Decidendi
The plaintiff was denied procedural fairness when the Tribunal Member refused to adjourn the hearing and continued in her absence, preventing her from presenting evidence on a central factual issue regarding the amount received for the trade-in vehicle. This denial constituted grounds for setting aside the Tribunal's orders.
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld; Tribunal orders set aside; matter remitted; costs ordered against second defendant.
Orders
- The appeal is upheld.
- The orders of Tribunal Member D Turley dated 14 February 2013 are set aside.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment