Jetopay Pty Ltd v Ocean Marine Mutual Insurance Association (Europe) OV [2000] FCA 239

Jetopay Pty Ltd v Ocean Marine Mutual Insurance Association (Europe) OV [2000] FCA 239

The Court made the proposed orders because Harbour Pacific Underwriting Management Pty Limited was an intermediary agent for Ocean Marine Mutual Insurance Association (Europe) OV, so interest was to run from the earlier claim-based date; Sealand's 12 August 1998 letter was not a Calderbank offer warranting earlier indemnity costs; and costs should follow the outcomes of Jetopay's failed claim against Harbour Pacific Underwriting Management Pty Limited and Ocean Marine Mutual Insurance Association (Europe) OV's failed third cross claim.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
09 March 2000
Procedural Posture
In Admiralty; Costs and Interest Orders / Reasons for Orders Following Reasons for Judgment Delivered on 17 December 1999
Outcome
Judgment for Jetopay Pty Limited against Ocean Marine Mutual Insurance Association (Europe) OV; judgment for the second and third respondents on Jetopay's claims against them; all cross claims dismissed; costs ordered as specified.
Legal Topics
['indemnity Costs' 'calderbank Offer' 'pre Judgment Interest' 'cross Claims' 'agency']
['admiralty' 'costs' 'insurance'] ['indemnity Costs' 'calderbank Offer' 'pre Judgment Interest' 'cross Claims' 'agency']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

In Admiralty; Costs and Interest Orders / Reasons for Orders Following Reasons for Judgment Delivered on 17 December 1999

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ["Whether interest on damages awarded against the first respondent should accrue from one month after Jetopay's claim on Harbour Pacific Underwriting Management Pty Limited or from one month after 5 September 1997, when Ocean Marine Mutual Insurance Association (Europe) OV said it became aware of the claim." "Whether a letter dated 12 August 1998 from Sealand Insurance Brokers Pty Limited's solicitors constituted a Calderbank offer justifying indemnity costs from an earlier date." "How costs should be ordered in relation to Jetopay's unsuccessful claim against Harbour Pacific Underwriting Management Pty Limited and Ocean Marine Mutual Insurance Association (Europe) OV's unsuccessful third cross claim."]

Ratio Decidendi

The Court made the proposed orders because Harbour Pacific Underwriting Management Pty Limited was an intermediary agent for Ocean Marine Mutual Insurance Association (Europe) OV, so interest was to run from the earlier claim-based date; Sealand's 12 August 1998 letter was not a Calderbank offer warranting earlier indemnity costs; and costs should follow the outcomes of Jetopay's failed claim against Harbour Pacific Underwriting Management Pty Limited and Ocean Marine Mutual Insurance Association (Europe) OV's failed third cross claim.

Court Disposition

Judgment for Jetopay Pty Limited against Ocean Marine Mutual Insurance Association (Europe) OV; judgment for the second and third respondents on Jetopay's claims against them; all cross claims dismissed; costs ordered as specified.

Orders

  • ['There be judgment for the Applicant against the First Respondent in the sum of $350,051.38 plus interest at the rate of $73.25 per day from 18 February 2000 to date.' "There be judgment for the Second and Third Respondents in respect of the Applicant's claims against them." 'The First, Second and Third Cross...