JF v Public Guardian & anor [2007] NSWADTAP 5

JF v Public Guardian & anor [2007] NSWADTAP 5

JF did not establish any question of law or demonstrate unorthodox or unfair procedure by the Guardianship Tribunal. Mere disagreement is not enough to grant leave to appeal on other grounds.

Parties
Appellant: JF; First Respondent: Public Guardian; Second Respondent: Guardianship Tribunal
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
17 January 2007
Procedural Posture
External Appeal / Permission to Appeal Out of Time and on Grounds Other Than Question of Law
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Guardianship Order, Leave to Appeal, Leave to Appeal Out of Time
Guardianship Guardianship Order Leave to Appeal Leave to Appeal Out of Time

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

JF

Appellant

Public Guardian

First Respondent

Guardianship Tribunal

Second Respondent

Procedural Posture

External Appeal / Permission to Appeal Out of Time and on Grounds Other Than Question of Law

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the appeal should be accepted out of time
  2. 2 Whether leave should be granted to appeal on grounds other than a question of law

Ratio Decidendi

JF did not establish any question of law or demonstrate unorthodox or unfair procedure by the Guardianship Tribunal. Mere disagreement is not enough to grant leave to appeal on other grounds.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Leave for the appeal to proceed on grounds other than a question of law is refused
  • Appeal dismissed