Zhang v The Hills Shire Council [2024] NSWLEC 1701
The Court is satisfied on the evidence, including joint agreement and compliance with statutory instruments as set out, that consent should be granted to the Amended Development Application, including the proposed height standard variation, in accordance with the agreed conditions and under the mechanisms in s 34 of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979.
- Parties
- Applicant: Jian Zhang; Respondent: The Hills Shire Council
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 01 November 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Class 1 Development Appeal / Final Orders Following Conciliation Conference and Agreement Between the Parties
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld; development consent granted; costs ordered
- Legal Topics
- Development Consent, Child Care Facilities, Height Standard Variation, Conciliation Conference, Costs Thrown Away
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Jian Zhang
Applicant
The Hills Shire Council
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Class 1 Development Appeal / Final Orders Following Conciliation Conference and Agreement Between the Parties
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether development consent should be granted to Amended Development Application No. 89/2024/HA for a centre-based child care facility
- 2 Whether the variation of maximum building height under cl 4.6 of The Hills Local Environmental Plan 2022 should be allowed
- 3 Whether conditions under relevant planning instruments and regulations are satisfied
Ratio Decidendi
The Court is satisfied on the evidence, including joint agreement and compliance with statutory instruments as set out, that consent should be granted to the Amended Development Application, including the proposed height standard variation, in accordance with the agreed conditions and under the mechanisms in s 34 of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979.
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld; development consent granted; costs ordered
Orders
- The applicant is to pay the respondent's costs thrown away by reason of the amendment of Development Application No. 89/2024/HA (PAN-350475) pursuant to s 8.15(3) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 in the agreed sum of $10,000 to be paid within 14 days of the date of these orders.
- The appeal is upheld.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment