McNamara v Consumer Trader and Tenancy Tribunal & anor [2003] NSWSC 349
The Roads & Traffic Authority is a statutory body representing the Crown for the purposes of any Act, and under s 5 of the Landlord and Tenant (Amendment) Act 1948, the Act does not bind the Crown. Therefore, the Tribunal's jurisdiction under the Residential Tenancies Act 1987 is affirmed and the appeal dismissed.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 28 April 2003
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed; proceedings remitted to Tribunal for further hearing; costs awarded to respondent.
- Legal Topics
- ['crown Immunity' 'application of Legislation to Residential Tenancies' "interpretation of 'statutory Body Representing the Crown'"]
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Does s 5 of the Landlord and Tenant (Amendment) Act 1948 (NSW) exclude the operation of that Act to statutory bodies representing the Crown such as the Roads & Traffic Authority?' 'Does the Consumer Trader and Tenancy Tribunal have jurisdiction under the Residential Tenancies Act 1987 (NSW) regarding the tenancy?' 'Is the termination notice served by the RTA valid under the applicable legislation?']
Ratio Decidendi
The Roads & Traffic Authority is a statutory body representing the Crown for the purposes of any Act, and under s 5 of the Landlord and Tenant (Amendment) Act 1948, the Act does not bind the Crown. Therefore, the Tribunal's jurisdiction under the Residential Tenancies Act 1987 is affirmed and the appeal dismissed.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed; proceedings remitted to Tribunal for further hearing; costs awarded to respondent.
Orders
- ['Judgment of the Tribunal affirmed.' 'Summons dismissed with costs.' 'Proceedings remitted to the Tribunal for further hearing.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment