Gerval v Pascoe [1999] FCA 1167

Gerval v Pascoe [1999] FCA 1167

The Court annulled Mr Gerval's bankruptcy because the material now before the Court established that he was solvent at the time of the sequestration order and that, had that material been before the Court then, the sequestration order would not have been made. The threshold under s 153B was therefore satisfied, and...

Source-derived case information.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
20 August 1999
Procedural Posture
Application Pursuant to S 153 B of the Bankruptcy Act 1966 for Annulment of Bankruptcy / Reasons for Judgment and Orders
Outcome
Bankruptcy annulled; costs and administration expenses ordered to be paid by Mr Gerval.
Legal Topics
['annulment of Bankruptcy' 'sequestration Order' 'solvency at Time of Sequestration Order' 'discretion Under S 153 B' 'costs of Petitioning Creditor and Trustee' 'bankrupt Leaving Australia Without Trustee Consent']
['bankruptcy and Insolvency'] ['annulment of Bankruptcy' 'sequestration Order' 'solvency at Time of Sequestration Order' 'discretion Under S 153 B' 'costs of Petitioning Creditor and Trustee' 'bankrupt Leaving Australia Without Trustee Consent']

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Application Pursuant to S 153 B of the Bankruptcy Act 1966 for Annulment of Bankruptcy / Reasons for Judgment and Orders

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the Court was satisfied that the sequestration order ought not to have been made.' 'Whether, if the threshold test under s 153B was met, the Court should exercise its discretion to annul the bankruptcy.' 'Whether the apparent breach of s 272(c) of the Bankruptcy Act 1966 should affect the exercise of discretion.']

Ratio Decidendi

The Court annulled Mr Gerval's bankruptcy because the material now before the Court established that he was solvent at the time of the sequestration order and that, had that material been before the Court then, the sequestration order would not have been made. The threshold under s 153B was therefore satisfied, and the discretion was exercised in Mr Gerval's favour because the trustee and creditors did not oppose annulment, the petitioning creditor's debt and other debts had been paid or arranged, and undertakings were given as to costs and administration expenses, notwithstanding concern about an apparent breach of s 272(c).

Court Disposition

Bankruptcy annulled; costs and administration expenses ordered to be paid by Mr Gerval.

Orders

  • ['The bankruptcy of Jimmi Gerval be annulled.' 'Mr Gerval pay the costs of the petitioning creditor of and incidental to the petition, including all reserved costs, to be taxed if not agreed.' 'Mr Gerval, on this application, pay the costs of the petitioning creditor, if any, and of the trustee, including reserved...