Application of Lin Tang t/as Lin Tang & Co Lawyers [2014] NSWSC 1877
It was not unreasonable for Lin Tang to pay the funds into Court given conflicting instructions and notice of multiple interests; he should not be ordered to pay the costs of the proceedings for payment out. As his involvement since 31 January was exclusively due to the costs application, he is entitled to his costs assessed at $7,500.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 02 May 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Payment Out of Funds in Court / Final Orders
- Outcome
- Orders made for payment out of funds in court; plaintiff paying funds in entitled to costs; applicant and second respondent's costs to be paid out of respective estates.
- Legal Topics
- ['funds in Court' 'trustee Liability' 'costs Orders']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application for Payment Out of Funds in Court / Final Orders
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether it was reasonable for the plaintiff to pay funds into Court' 'Entitlement to costs of payment out application' 'Proper apportionment of funds held in Court']
Ratio Decidendi
It was not unreasonable for Lin Tang to pay the funds into Court given conflicting instructions and notice of multiple interests; he should not be ordered to pay the costs of the proceedings for payment out. As his involvement since 31 January was exclusively due to the costs application, he is entitled to his costs assessed at $7,500.
Court Disposition
Orders made for payment out of funds in court; plaintiff paying funds in entitled to costs; applicant and second respondent's costs to be paid out of respective estates.
Orders
- ['Order that the funds in Court to the credit of these proceedings be paid out of Court as follows: (a) the sum of $7,500 to the plaintiff for his costs; (b) as to the balance: (i) 91.47 percent to Jing Sun and Yingjie Wang as trustees pursuant to order 4 made on 7 May 2012 in proceedings 2011/407378; (ii) 8.53...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment