Xie v Wen [2016] NSWCATOD 110
Fees paid to WB Legal were wasted and constitute a loss caused by the respondent's misconduct in falsifying an affidavit, and in the interests of justice the applicant should be recompensed for these fees; for the fees paid to Goodwin & Co, half the amount is allowed as partially attributable to the misconduct, as supported by the findings.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 17 August 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Financial Compensation Order Following Disciplinary Finding / Decision on the Papers
- Outcome
- Compensation order granted in part
- Legal Topics
- ['legal Practitioner Misconduct' 'financial Compensation Orders' 'legal Profession Uniform Law' 'loss Caused by Professional Misconduct']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application for Financial Compensation Order Following Disciplinary Finding / Decision on the Papers
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the applicant suffered 'loss because of the conduct concerned' within the meaning of Legal Profession Uniform Law s 309(1)(a)" 'Whether it is in the interests of justice to order compensation under s 309(1)(b)' 'The scope of compensable loss under the Uniform Law compared to previous statutory regimes' 'Whether specific heads of claimed loss are causally linked to the proven misconduct']
Ratio Decidendi
Fees paid to WB Legal were wasted and constitute a loss caused by the respondent's misconduct in falsifying an affidavit, and in the interests of justice the applicant should be recompensed for these fees; for the fees paid to Goodwin & Co, half the amount is allowed as partially attributable to the misconduct, as supported by the findings.
Court Disposition
Compensation order granted in part
Orders
- ['That the respondent pay compensation to the applicant in the amount of $5,320, less the amount of any fees already refunded by WB Legal to the applicant prior to the date of this decision.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment