Michels v Sutherland Shire Council [2007] NSWLEC 391
The proposal meets the objectives of cl 10.3 in the DCP and zone objectives in SREP 17. The height, bulk and scale are not so unacceptable as to be out of character with the streetscape, and the visual impact is minimised to an acceptable level. While the proposal is three storeys and does not comply with the numerical control, it maintains an outward appearance of two-storeys as required by the objectives.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 22 June 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld
- Legal Topics
- ['section 96 Application' 'height and Bulk Impact' 'streetscape Character' 'development Control Compliance']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the proposal has an unacceptable impact on the streetscape' 'Whether the proposal complies with objectives for height and zone under SREP 17' 'Consistency with objectives of height control and zone objectives']
Ratio Decidendi
The proposal meets the objectives of cl 10.3 in the DCP and zone objectives in SREP 17. The height, bulk and scale are not so unacceptable as to be out of character with the streetscape, and the visual impact is minimised to an acceptable level. While the proposal is three storeys and does not comply with the numerical control, it maintains an outward appearance of two-storeys as required by the objectives.
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld
Orders
- ['The appeal is upheld.' 'The application under s. 96 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 to modify development consent (00/1907) to construct a three-storey dwelling at 102 Prince Charles Parade, Kurnell is approved subject to the Conditions in Annexure "A".' 'The exhibits, except exhibits 1, 2, 4...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment