Police v JJ (a pseudonym) [2022] NSWLC 17
Section 17 of the Child Protection (Offenders Registration) Act 2000 (NSW) is concerned with the act of reporting required information, not its accuracy or correctness. A person does not commit an offence under s 17 by innocently providing incorrect information; criminal liability for knowingly providing materially false information is separately proscribed in s 18. Further, advance notification of changes is permitted under s 11. The accused, having notified police of the internet service provider based on information from the landlord (which was later discovered to be incorrect), was not in breach of s 17. Even if a breach had occurred, a reasonable excuse existed due to the...
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 23 September 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Trial and Judgment
- Outcome
- Charge dismissed; verdict of not guilty.
- Legal Topics
- ['child Protection (offenders Registration) Act 2000 (nsw)' 'reporting Obligations' 'reasonable Excuse' 'incorrect Information' 'criminal Procedure']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Trial and Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether provision of incorrect or inaccurate relevant personal information to police by a registrable person constitutes an offence under s 17 of the Act' 'Whether the Act permits a registrable person to notify a change in personal information in advance of the change coming into effect' "Whether 'reasonable excuse' is established under s 17(2) of the Act"]
Ratio Decidendi
Section 17 of the Child Protection (Offenders Registration) Act 2000 (NSW) is concerned with the act of reporting required information, not its accuracy or correctness. A person does not commit an offence under s 17 by innocently providing incorrect information; criminal liability for knowingly providing materially false information is separately proscribed in s 18. Further, advance notification of changes is permitted under s 11. The accused, having notified police of the internet service provider based on information from the landlord (which was later discovered to be incorrect), was not in breach of s 17. Even if a breach had occurred, a reasonable excuse existed due to the...
Court Disposition
Charge dismissed; verdict of not guilty.
Orders
- ['Charge dismissed' 'Non-publication order: name of accused and any material tending to identify the accused is not to be published']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment