JO v Protective Commissioner [2005] NSWADT 80

JO v Protective Commissioner [2005] NSWADT 80

It is in the best interests of JA for the property to be sold, as she cannot live in it, it is deteriorating, she cannot afford repairs or outgoings, her income is insufficient, and the loan used to cover accommodation bond is accruing interest, meaning sale is the correct and preferable decision.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
08 April 2005
Procedural Posture
Review Application / Merits Review
Outcome
decision affirmed
Legal Topics
['powers of Protective Commissioner' "sale of Protected Person's Property" 'review of Administrative Decision']
['protective Law' 'administrative Law'] ['powers of Protective Commissioner' "sale of Protected Person's Property" 'review of Administrative Decision']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Review Application / Merits Review

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ["Whether the decision to sell JA's property was the correct and preferable decision under s 63 of the Administrative Decisions Tribunal Act 1997"]

Ratio Decidendi

It is in the best interests of JA for the property to be sold, as she cannot live in it, it is deteriorating, she cannot afford repairs or outgoings, her income is insufficient, and the loan used to cover accommodation bond is accruing interest, meaning sale is the correct and preferable decision.

Court Disposition

decision affirmed

Orders

  • ['The decision made by the Office of the Protective Commissioner on 8 December 2004 to sell the property owned by JA is affirmed']