Doyle v Commonwealth [1985] HCA 46

Doyle v Commonwealth [1985] HCA 46

The order for committal made by Brooking J. on 7 October 1983 was invalid due to (1) failure to serve notice of the application on the persons affected, and (2) the improper form of the order, which allowed the Sheriff to determine which persons were subject to committal without them being specifically named or sufficiently identified.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Procedural Posture
Appeal and Application for Prerogative Relief / Appeal From Decisions of Brooking J. in the Supreme Court of Victoria, Including Orders for Committal for Contempt
Outcome
Appeal allowed; special leave to appeal re: 5 October order rescinded; order nisi discharged by consent.
Legal Topics
['committal for Contempt' 'personal Service of Notice of Motion' 'representative Orders' 'requirements for Ex Parte Orders' 'procedural Fairness']
['civil Procedure' 'contempt of Court'] ['committal for Contempt' 'personal Service of Notice of Motion' 'representative Orders' 'requirements for Ex Parte Orders' 'procedural Fairness']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Appeal and Application for Prerogative Relief / Appeal From Decisions of Brooking J. in the Supreme Court of Victoria, Including Orders for Committal for Contempt

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the order for committal for contempt made by Brooking J. on 7 October 1983 was valid given the absence of personal or substituted service of the notice of motion on the persons affected' 'Whether the form of the committal order, authorising the arrest of unidentified persons, was permissible']

Ratio Decidendi

The order for committal made by Brooking J. on 7 October 1983 was invalid due to (1) failure to serve notice of the application on the persons affected, and (2) the improper form of the order, which allowed the Sheriff to determine which persons were subject to committal without them being specifically named or sufficiently identified.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed; special leave to appeal re: 5 October order rescinded; order nisi discharged by consent.

Orders

  • ["Special leave to appeal against Brooking J.'s order of 5 October 1983 rescinded." 'Appeal from order of Brooking J. of 7 October 1983 allowed with costs.' 'Order of 7 October 1983 set aside.' 'Order nisi discharged by consent.']