Jenkins v Repatriation Commission [1999] FCA 269

Jenkins v Repatriation Commission [1999] FCA 269

The appeal failed because, even if the Tribunal erred in not giving adequate reasons regarding whether the applicant would have been living with the veteran but for his illness, the Tribunal's unchallenged finding that no marriage-like relationship existed at the relevant time was sufficient to uphold its conclusion...

Source-derived case information.

Parties
Applicant: Joan Eleanor Jenkins; Respondent: The Repatriation Commission
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
22 March 1999
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From Administrative Appeals Tribunal
Outcome
Application dismissed
Legal Topics
Dependency Status Under Veterans' Entitlements Act, Error of Law by Administrative Appeals Tribunal, Statutory Interpretation of 'widow' and 'marriage Like Relationship'
Administrative Law Veterans Law Dependency Status Under Veterans' Entitlements Act Error of Law by Administrative Appeals Tribunal Statutory Interpretation of 'widow' and 'marriage Like Relationship'

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Joan Eleanor Jenkins

Applicant

The Repatriation Commission

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From Administrative Appeals Tribunal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the applicant is a dependant of the late Alan Milton Jenkins within the meaning of the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986
  2. 2 Whether the Administrative Appeals Tribunal erred in law regarding the finding on marriage-like relationship and provision of adequate reasons per s 5E(2)(b)(i) and (iii)

Ratio Decidendi

The appeal failed because, even if the Tribunal erred in not giving adequate reasons regarding whether the applicant would have been living with the veteran but for his illness, the Tribunal's unchallenged finding that no marriage-like relationship existed at the relevant time was sufficient to uphold its conclusion that the applicant was not a dependant under the Act.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed

Orders

  • The application is dismissed.
  • No order as to costs.