Street & Ors v Hearne & Anor [2007] NSWCA 113

Street & Ors v Hearne & Anor [2007] NSWCA 113

By majority, the Court found that the proceedings involved civil contempt, permitting appeal; the implied undertaking not to use litigation documents except for proper purposes extended beyond the company to its agents and servants, and the respondents breached this obligation by transmitting documents to...

Source-derived case information.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
17 August 2007
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Final Judgment
Outcome
Appeal upheld
Legal Topics
['implied Undertaking Not to Use Documents Except for Litigation' 'breach of Undertaking to Court' 'civil Vs Criminal Contempt Distinction' 'contempt Liability for Servants and Agents' 'third Party Contempt' 'appeal From Acquittal']
['contempt of Court'] ['implied Undertaking Not to Use Documents Except for Litigation' 'breach of Undertaking to Court' 'civil Vs Criminal Contempt Distinction' 'contempt Liability for Servants and Agents' 'third Party Contempt' 'appeal From Acquittal']

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Final Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether appeal from acquittal for contempt is competent (civil vs criminal contempt)' 'Whether implied undertaking not to use court documents extends to servants and agents of a litigant' 'Whether respondents breached the implied undertaking and committed contempt' 'Whether parliamentary privilege protects use of court documents']

Ratio Decidendi

By majority, the Court found that the proceedings involved civil contempt, permitting appeal; the implied undertaking not to use litigation documents except for proper purposes extended beyond the company to its agents and servants, and the respondents breached this obligation by transmitting documents to governmental staff for extraneous purposes, thus committing contempt of court.

Court Disposition

Appeal upheld

Orders

  • ['Orders of Gzell J set aside and substituted with orders adjudging Mr Hearne and Mr Tierney guilty of contempt in the first charge in the Statements of Charge' 'Notices of Motion remitted to Gzell J for hearing as to penalty and appropriate orders for costs of first hearing' 'Mr Hearne and Mr Tierney to pay the...