Goncalves & Anor v Tsirakidis & Anor [2003] NSWLEC 426
The applicants are entitled to their costs, including the cost of the survey, because the respondents delayed in removing the encroachment, and the applicants were likely to have succeeded if the case had been litigated.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 15 December 2003
- Procedural Posture
- Application Under the Encroachment of Buildings Act 1922 / Costs Determination After Removal of Encroachment Without a Hearing on the Merits
- Outcome
- Respondents to pay applicants' costs, including the cost of the surveyor's report.
- Legal Topics
- ['encroachment of Building' 'court Orders for Costs' "costs of Surveyor's Report"]
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application Under the Encroachment of Buildings Act 1922 / Costs Determination After Removal of Encroachment Without a Hearing on the Merits
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Are the applicants entitled to costs, including the cost of a survey, after resolution of an encroachment of building dispute without a hearing on the merits?']
Ratio Decidendi
The applicants are entitled to their costs, including the cost of the survey, because the respondents delayed in removing the encroachment, and the applicants were likely to have succeeded if the case had been litigated.
Court Disposition
Respondents to pay applicants' costs, including the cost of the surveyor's report.
Orders
- ["Respondents to pay applicants' costs." "Respondents to pay the cost of obtaining the surveyor's report."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment