JOD v REGINA [2009] NSWCCA 205
Although there are some commonalities between the applicant, Cranshaw, and Marven, the applicant’s objective criminality was of a higher order by reason of his integral role, extended period of offending, and conditional liberty at the time of some offences. No marked disproportion in the head sentence exists to warrant intervention. The parity principle does not strictly apply as the relevant factual differences are substantial.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 25 August 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Leave to Appeal Against Sentence
- Outcome
- Leave to appeal granted. Appeal dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- ['appeal Against Sentence' 'parity Principle' 'organised Crime' 'fraud' 'application of Sentencing Principles']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Leave to Appeal Against Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether there was a lack of parity in sentencing compared to sentences imposed upon related offenders Darren Cranshaw and Jonathan Marven' 'Whether the applicant’s head sentence is disproportionate creating a justifiable sense of grievance']
Ratio Decidendi
Although there are some commonalities between the applicant, Cranshaw, and Marven, the applicant’s objective criminality was of a higher order by reason of his integral role, extended period of offending, and conditional liberty at the time of some offences. No marked disproportion in the head sentence exists to warrant intervention. The parity principle does not strictly apply as the relevant factual differences are substantial.
Court Disposition
Leave to appeal granted. Appeal dismissed.
Orders
- ['Leave to appeal granted.' 'The appeal is dismissed.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment