Aldag v Eistis [2008] NSWDC 157

Aldag v Eistis [2008] NSWDC 157

The respondent solicitor did not act without reasonable prospects of success. He was diligent, considered relevant law and evidence, and the failure of the plaintiff's claim was due to adverse credit findings and complexity, not unreasonable conduct or hopelessness. Grounds for a personal costs order under s 348 Legal Profession Act 2004 (NSW) were not established. Notice of Motion for personal liability for costs dismissed.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
07 August 2008
Procedural Posture
Notice of Motion Costs Application / Post Trial, Interlocutory Hearing
Outcome
Notice of Motion dismissed
Legal Topics
['personal Liability of Legal Practitioner for Costs' 'costs in Personal Injury Proceedings' 'reasonable Prospects of Success' 'exercise of Discretion in Costs Orders']
['civil Procedure' 'professional Responsibility' 'costs'] ['personal Liability of Legal Practitioner for Costs' 'costs in Personal Injury Proceedings' 'reasonable Prospects of Success' 'exercise of Discretion in Costs Orders']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Notice of Motion Costs Application / Post Trial, Interlocutory Hearing

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the solicitor acted without reasonable prospects of success in pursuing the personal injury claim for the plaintiff' 'Whether there was a basis for personal liability for costs under s 348 Legal Profession Act 2004 (NSW)' 'Whether insufficient material existed for solicitor to reasonably believe on provable facts and a reasonably arguable view of law that the claim had reasonable prospects of success']

Ratio Decidendi

The respondent solicitor did not act without reasonable prospects of success. He was diligent, considered relevant law and evidence, and the failure of the plaintiff's claim was due to adverse credit findings and complexity, not unreasonable conduct or hopelessness. Grounds for a personal costs order under s 348 Legal Profession Act 2004 (NSW) were not established. Notice of Motion for personal liability for costs dismissed.

Court Disposition

Notice of Motion dismissed

Orders

  • ['Notice of Motion dismissed' 'Costs reserved' 'Liberty to apply re costs' 'Exhibits retained until further order']