Butler v Gibson [2019] NSWCATAP 86
There was no denial of procedural fairness as Ms Butler had a reasonable opportunity to seek access and produce evidence but did not avail herself of it; the Tribunal's error in describing an engineer's report did not result in procedural unfairness or an unjust outcome; the evidence justified the Tribunal's findings, and there was no substantial miscarriage of justice or basis to grant leave to appeal.
- Parties
- Appellant: Jody Butler; Respondent: Gregory Gibson; Respondent: Lisa Gibson
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 12 April 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Appeal Panel Decision
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Dividing Fences, Procedural Fairness, Appeals, Evidentiary Matters
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Jody Butler
Appellant
Gregory Gibson
Respondent
Lisa Gibson
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Appeal Panel Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether there was a denial of procedural fairness due to denial of access
- 2 Whether the Tribunal erred in its findings regarding engineer's report
- 3 Whether orders were based on incorrect assumptions as to safety and longevity
Ratio Decidendi
There was no denial of procedural fairness as Ms Butler had a reasonable opportunity to seek access and produce evidence but did not avail herself of it; the Tribunal's error in describing an engineer's report did not result in procedural unfairness or an unjust outcome; the evidence justified the Tribunal's findings, and there was no substantial miscarriage of justice or basis to grant leave to appeal.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeal dismissed
- No change to the original Tribunal orders.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment