Butler v Gibson [2019] NSWCATAP 86

Butler v Gibson [2019] NSWCATAP 86

There was no denial of procedural fairness as Ms Butler had a reasonable opportunity to seek access and produce evidence but did not avail herself of it; the Tribunal's error in describing an engineer's report did not result in procedural unfairness or an unjust outcome; the evidence justified the Tribunal's findings, and there was no substantial miscarriage of justice or basis to grant leave to appeal.

Parties
Appellant: Jody Butler; Respondent: Gregory Gibson; Respondent: Lisa Gibson
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
12 April 2019
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Appeal Panel Decision
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Dividing Fences, Procedural Fairness, Appeals, Evidentiary Matters

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 11 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Jody Butler

Appellant

Gregory Gibson

Respondent

Lisa Gibson

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Appeal Panel Decision

  1. 1 Whether there was a denial of procedural fairness due to denial of access
  2. 2 Whether the Tribunal erred in its findings regarding engineer's report
  3. 3 Whether orders were based on incorrect assumptions as to safety and longevity

Ratio Decidendi

There was no denial of procedural fairness as Ms Butler had a reasonable opportunity to seek access and produce evidence but did not avail herself of it; the Tribunal's error in describing an engineer's report did not result in procedural unfairness or an unjust outcome; the evidence justified the Tribunal's findings, and there was no substantial miscarriage of justice or basis to grant leave to appeal.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Appeal dismissed
  • No change to the original Tribunal orders.