Gittany v Gittany (No 2) [2014] NSWSC 968
The application to set aside default judgment was dismissed; the principal defence was held not to be raised in good faith, justifying indemnity costs. Errors discovered in the debt calculation were corrected by consent, varying the amount of judgment.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 20 June 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Post Default Judgment, Costs Determination
- Outcome
- Application to set aside default judgment dismissed; default judgment varied by consent; plaintiff awarded indemnity costs of the application.
- Legal Topics
- ['indemnity Costs' 'application to Set Aside Default Judgment']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Civil / Post Default Judgment, Costs Determination
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the costs should be awarded on an indemnity basis following an unsuccessful application to set aside default judgment' 'Whether the quantum of the default judgment should be varied due to errors in calculation']
Ratio Decidendi
The application to set aside default judgment was dismissed; the principal defence was held not to be raised in good faith, justifying indemnity costs. Errors discovered in the debt calculation were corrected by consent, varying the amount of judgment.
Court Disposition
Application to set aside default judgment dismissed; default judgment varied by consent; plaintiff awarded indemnity costs of the application.
Orders
- ['Varied the amount of default judgment entered 25 February 2013 to $1,000,721.96 effective as at that date.' "Defendant to pay the plaintiff's costs of and incidental to the Notice of Motion to set aside default judgment as agreed or assessed on an indemnity basis." 'No order made for additional pre-default...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment