Ku-Ring-Gai Council v Vinci [2007] NSWLEC 283
The defendant breached conditions of development consent by directing work that resulted in demolition of heritage elements, but acted mistakenly rather than recklessly with minor environmental harm. Taking into account the early guilty plea, cooperation, lack of prior convictions, good character, and bearing the prosecutor's costs, a penalty of $14,000 is appropriate.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 14 May 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Prosecution / Sentencing After Guilty Plea
- Outcome
- Defendant convicted and fined.
- Legal Topics
- ['breach of Development Consent' 'heritage Protection' 'sentencing' 'mitigating Circumstances']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Prosecution / Sentencing After Guilty Plea
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the defendant carried out development otherwise than in accordance with the conditions of development consent in breach of s 125(1) Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979.' 'Appropriate sentence to be imposed for the offence considering mitigating factors and seriousness of breach.']
Ratio Decidendi
The defendant breached conditions of development consent by directing work that resulted in demolition of heritage elements, but acted mistakenly rather than recklessly with minor environmental harm. Taking into account the early guilty plea, cooperation, lack of prior convictions, good character, and bearing the prosecutor's costs, a penalty of $14,000 is appropriate.
Court Disposition
Defendant convicted and fined.
Orders
- ['Defendant convicted of the offence with which charged.' 'Defendant fined $14,000 payable within 28 days.' "Defendant to pay Prosecutor's costs as agreed or assessed." 'Exhibits may be returned.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment