Kumar v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [1999] FCA 1233
The Tribunal's decision letter dated 27 January 1999 was posted on 28 January 1999 to the applicant's last address for service. Regulation 5.03, in its amended form and as part of the legislative scheme, applied for the purposes of the Act so that the document was taken to be received on 3 February 1999. That deemed receipt constituted notification for s 478(1)(b). The application lodged on 8 March 1999 was not lodged within 28 days of that notification and was therefore not competent, so it had to be dismissed.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 09 September 1999
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Review of a Refugee Review Tribunal Decision Affirming Refusal of a Protection Visa / Final Judgment on Respondent's Objection to Jurisdiction/competency Based on Time Limit Under S 478(1)(b) of the Migration Act 1958 (cth)
- Outcome
- Application for review dismissed as out of time and not competent.
- Legal Topics
- ['protection Visa' 'judicial Review Time Limit' 'notification of Tribunal Decision' 'deemed Receipt of Documents' 'jurisdiction of the Federal Court']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application for Review of a Refugee Review Tribunal Decision Affirming Refusal of a Protection Visa / Final Judgment on Respondent's Objection to Jurisdiction/competency Based on Time Limit Under S 478(1)(b) of the Migration Act 1958 (cth)
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the application for review was lodged within 28 days of the applicant being notified of the Tribunal's decision under s 478(1)(b) of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth)." 'Whether notification under s 478(1)(b) requires actual knowledge of the Tribunal decision or may be effected by deemed receipt under reg 5.03 of the Migration Regulations.' 'Whether the application for review was competent.']
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal's decision letter dated 27 January 1999 was posted on 28 January 1999 to the applicant's last address for service. Regulation 5.03, in its amended form and as part of the legislative scheme, applied for the purposes of the Act so that the document was taken to be received on 3 February 1999. That deemed receipt constituted notification for s 478(1)(b). The application lodged on 8 March 1999 was not lodged within 28 days of that notification and was therefore not competent, so it had to be dismissed.
Court Disposition
Application for review dismissed as out of time and not competent.
Orders
- ['The application for review is dismissed.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment