Wilcox v Cottrell [2001] FCA 1357
There are no viable grounds to withhold the making of a sequestration order; the respondent failed to establish any legal basis for setting aside the judgment and no sufficient cause was shown to prevent the order; statutory and procedural requirements for bankruptcy were satisfied.
- Parties
- Applicant: John Alfred Wilcox; Respondent: David Mervyn Cottrell
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 21 September 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Bankruptcy Proceeding / Hearing De Novo After Remittal by Full Court
- Outcome
- application for sequestration order granted
- Legal Topics
- Sequestration Order, Abuse of Process, Non Compliance With Bankruptcy Notice, Champertous Agreement
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
John Alfred Wilcox
Applicant
David Mervyn Cottrell
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Bankruptcy Proceeding / Hearing De Novo After Remittal by Full Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a sequestration order should be made against the respondent's estate
- 2 Whether alleged abuse of process by champertous agreement prevents bankruptcy proceedings
- 3 Whether failure to comply with bankruptcy notice constitutes an act of bankruptcy
Ratio Decidendi
There are no viable grounds to withhold the making of a sequestration order; the respondent failed to establish any legal basis for setting aside the judgment and no sufficient cause was shown to prevent the order; statutory and procedural requirements for bankruptcy were satisfied.
Court Disposition
application for sequestration order granted
Orders
- A sequestration order be made against the estate of the Respondent.
- Respondent to pay the costs of the Applicant of the proceedings.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment