Angius v Salier (No 4) [2019] NSWSC 1698
Although the evidence did not clearly establish that the plaintiff was a person under legal incapacity for the purposes of Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), r 7.18(1), it did establish sufficient doubt about his capacity to provide proper instructions to justify appointment of a tutor under the Court's parens patriae jurisdiction. Given the solicitor's inability to obtain meaningful instructions, the risk of placing him in an impossible position, and the additional though not independently compelling medical evidence, the Court appointed the NSW Trustee and Guardian as tutor and vacated the hearing.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 25 November 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Procedure Application in Equity Proceedings / Urgent Pre Trial Application for Appointment of a Tutor and Adjournment; Hearing Date Vacated
- Outcome
- Application granted in part; NSW Trustee and Guardian appointed as the plaintiff's tutor and the hearing vacated.
- Legal Topics
- ['appointment of Tutor' 'person Under Legal Incapacity' 'parens Patriae Jurisdiction' 'adjournment' 'withdrawal of Appearance' 'capacity to Give Instructions']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Civil Procedure Application in Equity Proceedings / Urgent Pre Trial Application for Appointment of a Tutor and Adjournment; Hearing Date Vacated
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the Court should appoint a tutor for the plaintiff where the plaintiff's solicitor could not obtain meaningful instructions and had concerns about capacity." 'Whether the plaintiff was a person under legal incapacity for the purposes of Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), r 7.18(1).' "Whether the Court could appoint a tutor under its parens patriae jurisdiction where there may be doubt as to the plaintiff's capacity." "Whether the hearing should be adjourned or vacated in light of the plaintiff's capacity issues and medical evidence."]
Ratio Decidendi
Although the evidence did not clearly establish that the plaintiff was a person under legal incapacity for the purposes of Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), r 7.18(1), it did establish sufficient doubt about his capacity to provide proper instructions to justify appointment of a tutor under the Court's parens patriae jurisdiction. Given the solicitor's inability to obtain meaningful instructions, the risk of placing him in an impossible position, and the additional though not independently compelling medical evidence, the Court appointed the NSW Trustee and Guardian as tutor and vacated the hearing.
Court Disposition
Application granted in part; NSW Trustee and Guardian appointed as the plaintiff's tutor and the hearing vacated.
Orders
- ["Order the NSW Trustee and Guardian be appointed as the plaintiff's tutor for the conduct of these proceedings." "Grant liberty to the plaintiff's solicitor to apply on short notice, either to discharge the appointment of a tutor to the plaintiff, or to appoint someone else as his tutor for the conduct of the...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment